PhilSci Archive

Rethinking Holism and Underdetermination

Boge, Florian J. (2025) Rethinking Holism and Underdetermination. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img] Text
ConfHolAAM.pdf

Download (289kB)

Abstract

Mature scientific hypotheses are confirmed by large amounts of independent evidence. How could anyone be an anti-realist under these conditions? A classic response appeals to confirmational holism and underdetermination, but it is unclear whether traditional arguments succeed. I offer a new line of argument: If holism is interpreted as saying that the confirmation of every part of a hypothesis depends on the confirmation of the whole hypothesis, we must formulate conditions under which the confirmation received by the whole can be transferred to its parts. However, underdetermination suggests that relevant conditions are typically not met. If this is true, the confirmation received by the whole remains bounded by the priors for the parts, and we lack compelling reasons to believe substantive hypotheses based on evidence beyond the degree to which the posits involved in them are antecedently believed. A rejoinder comes from selective realism: If some posit is preserved throughout theory change, it is confirmed beyond the degree to which the containing hypothesis is. However, the variant of holism considered here exactly implies that we cannot confirm such posits in isolation. As I will show, the realist is thus forced into a dilemma: Either she succumbs to the holistic challenge, or she must embrace meta-empirical facts, such as the posit's recurrence, as confirmatory.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Boge, Florian J.florian-johannes.boge@udo.edu0000-0002-1030-3393
Keywords: holism; underdetermination; selective realism; meta-empirical evidence
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Evidence
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Theory Change
Depositing User: Prof. Dr. Florian Boge
Date Deposited: 13 Sep 2025 12:23
Last Modified: 13 Sep 2025 12:23
Item ID: 26632
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Evidence
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Theory Change
Date: 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/26632

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item