Ratti, Emanuele and Termine, Alberto and Facchini, Alessandro (2025) Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
![]() |
Text
Theory-ladenness in ML - R1, draft September.pdf Download (583kB) |
Abstract
We provide an analysis of theory-ladenness in machine learning (ML) in science, where ‘theory’ (that we call 'domain-theory') refers to the domain knowledge of the scientific discipline where ML is used. By constructing an account of ML models based on a comparison with phenomenological models, we show (against recent trends in philosophy of science) that ML model-building is mostly indifferent to domain-theory, even if the model remains theory-laden in a weak sense, which we call theory-infection. These claims, we argue, have far-reaching consequences for the transferability of ML across scientific disciplines, and shift the priorities of the debate on theory-ladenness in ML from descriptive to normative.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. (deposited 05 Sep 2024 12:51)
-
Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. (deposited 22 Aug 2025 14:36)
- Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. (deposited 02 Oct 2025 10:40) [Currently Displayed]
-
Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. (deposited 22 Aug 2025 14:36)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |