Norton, John D. (2024) The Rise and Fall of Karl Popper's Anti-inductivism. [Preprint]
|
Text
Popper_anti-inductivism.pdf Download (345kB) |
Abstract
Karl Popper’s attempt to find an account of the rationality of science without inductive inference was a bold and philosophically rigorous response to the problem of induction. It was bound to fail since science is ineliminably an inductive enterprise. The failing lay not with scientists for using a defective argument form but with philosophers who were unable to account for the success of inductive inference. Such an account is provided by the material theory of induction.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | falsifications, induction, inductive inference, Karl Popper | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Evidence General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Philosophers of Science |
||||||
| Depositing User: | John Norton | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2025 21:17 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 13 Nov 2025 21:17 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 27217 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Evidence General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Philosophers of Science |
||||||
| Date: | 3 November 2024 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/27217 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



