PhilSci Archive

Judging the Worth of Pursuing: Assessing the Dynamic Responsivity of a Project to Experimental and Model-Building Practices

Penn, William and Bauer, Arica (2025) Judging the Worth of Pursuing: Assessing the Dynamic Responsivity of a Project to Experimental and Model-Building Practices. [Preprint]

[img] Text
AR_JWPADR (Final, Complete Manuscript).docx

Download (3MB)

Abstract

We argue that scientific projects should be judged as pursuit-worthy in virtue of their dynamicity. We give three non-exhaustive dimensions of dynamicity, developed in the context of three case studies: (1) dynamic responsivity to experimental and observational practices, developed by comparing Ptolemaic astronomical projects to pseudoscientific geocentrism; (2) dynamic responsivity to concurrent developing modeling projects, developed by analyzing epidemiologist risk-assessments and resulting projective choices; (3) responsivity to evolving contexts for application and implementation, the evolution of which is driven by the very development of the project, developed by analyzing the 2013 Eindhoven conference assessment of climate modeling and shaping of policy. We argue in the second half that judgments of dynamism can be philosophically and practically implemented in real-time assessments of current projects. Specifically, tracking responsivity to increasingly stable past practices allows us to track a project’s changing viability, and tracking responsivity to projections of stabilizing projects and practices allows us to track a project’s changing promise. We argue that both of these assessments can be most effectively performed by those who both understand the history and philosophy of science and the specific science projects themselves. Therefore, we argue that embedding philosophers of science, who continue to participate in the philosophical community for assessment of their philosophical work and capability, will yield the best results for judging the worth of pursuing a scientific project. Decisions about the proportional allocation of resources will therefore be made as part of dynamic trajectories of support, rather than static determinations of value and worth.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Penn, Williampennwilliam42@gmail.com0000-0002-6276-5119
Bauer, Aricaarbauer@uwm.edu0009-0005-1299-4254
Additional Information: forthcoming in European Journal for Philosophy of Science
Keywords: Pursuit-Worthiness, Ptolemaic Astronomy, Epidemiological Risk Assessment, Climate Models, Viability, Practical Resource Allocation, Process Philosophy of Science
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Astrophysics
Specific Sciences > Climate Science and Meteorology
Specific Sciences > Medicine > Epidemiology
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > Explanation
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
General Issues > Models and Idealization
General Issues > Science and Policy
General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Theory Change
Depositing User: Dr. W. P.
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2025 14:19
Last Modified: 26 Nov 2025 14:19
Item ID: 27292
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Astrophysics
Specific Sciences > Climate Science and Meteorology
Specific Sciences > Medicine > Epidemiology
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > Explanation
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
General Issues > Models and Idealization
General Issues > Science and Policy
General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Theory Change
Date: 24 November 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/27292

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item