PhilSci Archive

Ad Hominem Arguments in Scientific Discourses – Rational Heuristic or Dangerous Immunisation Strategy?

Schäfer, Leon-Philip (2025) Ad Hominem Arguments in Scientific Discourses – Rational Heuristic or Dangerous Immunisation Strategy? [Preprint]

[img] Text
Ad Hominem Arguments in Scientific Discourses.pdf

Download (404kB)

Abstract

Ad hominem arguments have, in terms of their relevance for scientific discourses, a peculiar status that seems to be surprisingly unfathomed in modern philosophy of science. The main aim of the current paper is to shed some light on this latent blind spot and to familiarise philosophers of science with some of the recent discussions that this topic has launched in argumentation theory. In particular, I would like to examine whether ad hominem arguments are to be regarded as epistemically detrimental and should be kept out of scientific discussions altogether or whether we should embrace a more nuanced evaluation that allows for the view that such arguments can be legitimate sometimes. While the modern literature in argumentation theory tends to support a remarkably permissive assessment of ad hominem arguments, the paper advocates for a more cautious conclusion: it shows that ad hominem arguments have the potential to damage or even outright destroy the basis of rational discussions, by substituting the factual criticism of theories with the personal denunciation of their creators. Because of this, a careless rehabilitation of such arguments is not recommended.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Schäfer, Leon-Philiplschaefer@uni-wuppertal.de0000-0003-0132-3963
Keywords: Ad hominem, argumentation theory, critical rationalism, dogmatism, immunisation strategy
Subjects: General Issues > Evidence
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Depositing User: Dr. Leon-Philip Schäfer
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2025 12:11
Last Modified: 26 Nov 2025 12:11
Item ID: 27303
Subjects: General Issues > Evidence
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Date: November 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/27303

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item