Northcott, Robert (2023) Prediction, history and political science. [Preprint]
|
Text
2023 Politl handbook, 'Prediction, history'.docx Download (77kB) |
Abstract
Political science usually requires either prediction or contextual historical work to succeed. Because of the difficulty of prediction, the main focus should often be contextual historical work. Both of these methods favor narrow-scope explanations. I illustrate, via an example, the role that this still leaves for theory. I conclude by assessing the scope for political science to offer policy advice. All of this tells against several practices that are widespread in the discipline.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Explanation Specific Sciences > Historical Sciences |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Professor Robert Northcott | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2026 20:25 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 21 Feb 2026 20:25 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 28297 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Explanation Specific Sciences > Historical Sciences |
||||||
| Date: | 1 January 2023 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/28297 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



