PhilSci Archive

Social interdependencies: the deep evolutionary roots of morality and normativity

van Schaik, Carel P. and Brügger, Rahel K. and Burkart, Judith M. (2026) Social interdependencies: the deep evolutionary roots of morality and normativity. [Preprint]

[img] Text
20260226_socialinterdependencies_preprint.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (568kB)

Abstract

We propose that minimal morality (experiencing “ought-thoughts”) and minimal normativity (having expectations or “standards”) historically emerged in the context of parental care among animals. Subsequently, in animals that formed stable, personalized societies, the moral motivation was functionally extended to enable interdependent social relationships (bonds, with kin, but also with non-kin as same-sex social or pair bonds), whereas the presence of normative expectations for the partner’s behavior in social bonds emerged concomitantly because the ever-present risk of shirking requires evaluation of the partner’s social actions. This social evaluation is extended toward the actions of other group members whenever individuals can switch to other bonded partners or allies. The spectrum of responses to partners’ actions can range from shunning to punishment, depending on the strength of the fitness-augmentation effects of bonds or alliances. We do not expect individuals to socially evaluate the actions of non-group members, except in dispersal situations. This functional hypothesis for the evolution of morality and normativity is supported by extensive behavioral and physiological evidence from various social animals. In sum, we argue that morality and normativity are fundamentally social, both serving to sustain dyadic relationships of interdependence that are inherently threatened by free riding. Human morality and normativity are an extension of this basic dyadic version, by involving group-level interdependencies, and presumably also by involving an awareness of the same motivations and social evaluations in others, which, through language-based negotiation and reflection, permits the explicit formulation of moral prescriptions, which may therefore vary culturally.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
van Schaik, Carel P.vschaik@aim.uzh.ch0000-0001-5738-4509
Brügger, Rahel K.rahelkatharina.bruegger@iea.uzh.ch0000-0001-8373-2255
Burkart, Judith M.judith.burkart@iea.uzh.ch0000-0002-6229-525X
Keywords: animal morality, animal normativity, evolution of morality, evolution of normativity
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Anthropology
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory
Specific Sciences > Psychology > Comparative Psychology and Ethology
Depositing User: Dr Rahel Katharina Brügger
Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2026 21:14
Last Modified: 27 Feb 2026 21:14
Item ID: 28366
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Anthropology
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory
Specific Sciences > Psychology > Comparative Psychology and Ethology
Date: 2026
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/28366

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item