PhilSci Archive

Like It or Not — Recommender Systems Lack a Coherent Normative Foundation

Khosrowi, Donal and Beck, Lukas (2026) Like It or Not — Recommender Systems Lack a Coherent Normative Foundation. The 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '26).

[img] Text
Khosrowi_Beck_Like it or Not_FAccT26_preprint.pdf

Download (511kB)

Abstract

Recommender Systems (RS) are among the most widely-deployed types of algorithmic systems, shaping the contents and items that billions of users see, engage with, and purchase on a daily basis. A dominant narrative in the literature characterizes RS as estimating user’s preferences and using this information to recommend good items for users. What is striking about this narrative is that it offers a welfare consequentialist justification for RS, in which preference satisfaction is the core welfare criterion that tells us how to rank outcomes in terms of agents' welfare. We argue that this justification is severely undertheorized and defective. More specifically, RS research currently lacks a coherent conceptualization of the relationship between preference, choice, and welfare. As a consequence, most RS research lacks an explicit and coherent theory of welfare-relevant preferences. Instead, it gestures towards outdated economic theories that have since been contravened by decades of research in the behavioral sciences and philosophy. To make our case, we draw out several interconnected challenges that call into question whether RS deals in genuine information about welfare-relevant preferences. To address these challenges, we sketch the contours of an interdisciplinary research program to put RS on coherent welfare-theoretical foundations.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Khosrowi, Donaldonal.khosrowi@philos.uni-hannover.de0000-0002-9927-2000
Beck, Lukaslukas.beck@philos.uni-hannover.de0000-0001-6364-2332
Keywords: Recommender Systems, Preferences, Welfare, Normative Foundations, Performativity, Self-Fulfilling Prediction, Feedback Loops, Ethics, Responsibility, AI Policy
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence > AI and Ethics
Specific Sciences > Computer Science
Specific Sciences > Economics
General Issues > Ethical Issues
Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning
General Issues > Technology
Depositing User: Donal Khosrowi
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2026 22:07
Last Modified: 28 Apr 2026 22:07
Item ID: 29368
Journal or Publication Title: The 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '26)
Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery, ACM
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1145/3805689.3806531
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence > AI and Ethics
Specific Sciences > Computer Science
Specific Sciences > Economics
General Issues > Ethical Issues
Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning
General Issues > Technology
Date: 2026
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29368

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item