PhilSci Archive

The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Confirmation in Molecular Biology

Weber, Marcel (2007) The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Confirmation in Molecular Biology. In: UNSPECIFIED.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)

Download (1MB)


I defend the view that single experiments can provide a sufficient reason for preferring one among a group of hypotheses against the widely held belief that “crucial experiments” are impossible. My argument is based on the examination of a historical case from molecular biology, namely the Meselson-Stahl experiment. “The most beautiful experiment in biology”, as it is known, provided the first experimental evidence for the operation of a semi-conservative mechanism of DNA replication, as predicted by Watson and Crick in 1953. I use a mechanistic account of explanation to show that this case is best construed as an inference to the best explanation (IBE). Furthermore, I show how such an account can deal with Duhem's well-known arguments against crucial experiments as well as Van Fraassen's “bad lot” argument against IBE.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Weber, Marcel
Keywords: Confirmation, induction, molecular biology, DNA replication, crucial experiments, inference to the best explanation
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Depositing User: Marcel Weber
Date Deposited: 06 Mar 2007
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:14
Item ID: 3218
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Date: 2007

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item