PhilSci Archive

Is Aldo Leopold's ‘Land Community’ an Individual?

Millstein, Roberta L. (2016) Is Aldo Leopold's ‘Land Community’ an Individual? [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
Text
Millstein - Land Community as Individual - 2-5.pdf

Download (946kB) | Preview

Abstract

The “land community” (or “biotic community”) that features centrally in Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic has typically been equated with the concept of “ecosystem.” Moreover, some have challenged this central Leopoldean concept given the multitude of meanings of the term “ecosystem” and the changes the term has undergone since Leopold’s time (see, e.g., Shrader-Frechette 1996). Even one of Leopold’s primary defenders, J. Baird Callicott, asserts that there are difficulties in identifying the boundaries of ecosystems and suggests that we recognize that their boundaries are determined by scientific questions ecologists pose (Callicott 2013). I argue that we need to rethink Leopold’s concept of land community in the following ways. First, we should recognize that Leopold’s views are not identical to those of his contemporaries (e.g., Clements, Elton), although they resemble those of some subsequent ecologists, including some of our contemporaries (e.g., O’Neill 2001, Post et al. 2007, Hastings and Gross 2012). Second, the land community concept does not map cleanly onto the concept of “ecosystem”; it also incorporates elements of the “community” concept in community ecology by emphasizing the interactions between organisms and not just the matter/energy flow of the ecosystem concept. Third, the boundary question can be illuminated by considering some of the recent literature on the nature of biological individuals (in particular, Odenbaugh 2007; Hamilton, Smith, and Haber 2009; Millstein 2009), focusing on concentrations of causal relations as determinative of the boundaries of the land community qua individual. There are challenges to be worked out, particularly when the interactions of community members do not map cleanly onto matter/energy flows, but I argue that these challenges can be resolved. The result is a defensible land community concept that is ontologically robust enough to be a locus of moral obligation while being consistent with contemporary ecological theory and practice.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Millstein, Roberta L.rlmillstein@ucdavis.edu
Additional Information: Forthcoming in Individuation across Experimental and Theoretical Sciences, edited by Otávio Bueno, Ruey-Lin Chen, and Melinda B. Fagan. There may be small differences between this version and the final version.
Keywords: Aldo Leopold, land community, biotic community, ecosystem, individuality, individuals, interdependence, causal interaction, land ethic, ecology, boundaries
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Ecology/Conservation
General Issues > Ethical Issues
Depositing User: Dr. Roberta L. Millstein
Date Deposited: 13 Aug 2016 19:03
Last Modified: 13 Aug 2016 19:03
Item ID: 12363
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Ecology/Conservation
General Issues > Ethical Issues
Date: 2016
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12363

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item