PhilSci Archive

A Simpler and More Realistic Subjective Decision Theory

Gaifman, Haim and Liu, Yang (2016) A Simpler and More Realistic Subjective Decision Theory. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
Text
realistic.pdf - Submitted Version

Download (697kB) | Preview

Abstract

In his classic Savage (1954/1972) develops a formal system of rational decision making. It is based on (i) a set of possible states of the world, (ii) a set of consequences, (iii) a set of acts, which are functions from states to consequences, and (iv) a preference relation over the acts, which represents the preferences of an idealized rational agent. The goal and the culmination of the enterprise is a representation theorem: Any preference relation that satisfies certain arguably acceptable postulates determines a (finitely additive) probability distribution over the states and a utility assignment to the consequences, such that the preferences among acts are determined by their expected utilities. Additional problematic assumptions are however required in Savage's proofs. First, there is a Boolean algebra of events (sets of states) which determines the richness of the set of acts. The probabilities are assigned to members of this algebra. Savage's proof requires that this be a σ-algebra (i.e., closed under infinite countable unions and intersections), which makes for an extremely rich preference relation. On Savage's view we should not require the probability to be σ-additive. He therefore finds the insistence on a σ-algebra, peculiar and is unhappy with it. But he sees no way of avoiding it. Second, the assignment of utilities requires the constant act assumption: for every consequence there is a constant act, which yields that consequence in every state. This assumption is known to be highly counterintuitive. The present work includes two mathematical results. The first, and more difficult one, shows that the σ-algebra assumption can be dropped. The second states that, as long as utilities are assigned to finite gambles only, the constant act assumption can be replaced by the plausible, much weaker assumption that there are at least two non-equivalent constant acts. The paper discusses the notion of "idealized agent" that underlies Savage's approach, and argues that the simplified system, which is adequate for all the actual purposes for which the system is designed, involves a more realistic notion of an idealized agent.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Gaifman, Haimhg17@columbia.edu
Liu, Yangliu@yliu.net
Keywords: subjective probability, expected utilities, Savage axioms, realistic decision theory, partition tree, Boolean algebra
Subjects: General Issues > Decision Theory
Depositing User: Dr Yang Liu
Date Deposited: 02 Jun 2017 16:51
Last Modified: 02 Jun 2017 16:51
Item ID: 13091
Subjects: General Issues > Decision Theory
Date: 1 March 2016
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13091

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item