Sytsma, Justin and Reuter, Kevin
(2017)
Experimental Philosophy of Pain.
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 34 (3).
pp. 611-628.
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
The standard view of pains among philosophers today is that their existence consists in being experienced. The typical line of support offered for this view is that it corresponds with the ordinary or commonsense conception of pain. Despite this, a growing body of evidence from experimental philosophers indicates that the ordinary understanding of pain stands in contrast to the standard view among philosophers. In this paper, we will survey this literature and add to it, detailing the results of seven new studies on the ordinary understanding of pain using both questionnaire and corpus analysis methods.
Item Type: |
Published Article or Volume
|
Creators: |
Creators | Email | ORCID |
---|
Sytsma, Justin | | | Reuter, Kevin | | |
|
Additional Information: |
Penultimate version. Appears in Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 34(3): 611-628, special issue on experimental philosophy edited by J. Knobe, E. Machery, and S. Stich. |
Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science |
Depositing User: |
Justin Sytsma
|
Date Deposited: |
03 Nov 2017 18:38 |
Last Modified: |
03 Nov 2017 18:38 |
Item ID: |
14089 |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research |
DOI or Unique Handle: |
10.1007/s40961-017-0121-y |
Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science |
Date: |
28 August 2017 |
Page Range: |
pp. 611-628 |
Volume: |
34 |
Number: |
3 |
URI: |
https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/14089 |
Available Versions of this Item
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |