PhilSci Archive

When No Reason For Is A Reason Against

Eva, Benjamin and Hartmann, Stephan (2017) When No Reason For Is A Reason Against. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

NRF_Final (1).pdf

Download (178kB) | Preview


We provide a Bayesian justification of the idea that, under certain conditions, the absence of an argument in favour of the truth of a hypothesis H constitutes a good argument against the truth of H.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Hartmann, Stephans.hartmann@lmu.de0000-0001-8676-2177
Keywords: Bayesian Epistemology, Argumentation
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Depositing User: Dr Benjamin Eva
Date Deposited: 21 Nov 2017 21:51
Last Modified: 12 Jul 2024 17:24
Item ID: 14132
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Date: 29 June 2017

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item