PhilSci Archive

Popper and Wittgenstein on the Metaphysics of Experience

Smit, Harry (2015) Popper and Wittgenstein on the Metaphysics of Experience. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. ISSN 0925-4560

[img]
Preview
Text
Popper and Wittgenstein on the Metaphysics of Experience.pdf

Download (428kB) | Preview

Abstract

In the Tractatus Wittgenstein argued that there are metaphysical truths. But these are ineffable, for metaphysical sentences try to say what can only be shown. Accordingly, they are pseudo-propositions because they are ill-formed. In the Investigations he no longer thought that metaphysical propositions are pseudo-propositions, but argued that they are either nonsense or norms of descriptions. Popper criticized Wittgenstein’s ideas and argued that metaphysical truths are effable. Yet it is by now clear that he misunderstood Wittgenstein’s arguments (namely that metaphysical propositions are ill-formed because they employ unbound variables) and misguidedly thought that Wittgenstein used the principle of verification for distinguishing empirical propositions from metaphysical propositions. Because Popper developed his philosophy in part as a critique of Wittgenstein’s philosophy, this invites the question of whether these misunderstandings have consequences for his own philosophy. I discuss this question and argue that Popper’s attempt to distinguish metaphysics and science with the aid of a criterion of testability is from Wittgenstein’s perspective misguided. The main problem facing Popper’s philosophy is that alleged metaphysical propositions are not theoretical propositions but rules for descriptions (in the misleading guise of empirical propositions). If Wittgenstein’s ideas are correct, then metaphysical problems are not scientific but grammatical problems which can only be resolved through conceptual investigations.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Smit, Harryh.smit0@outlook.com
Additional Information: Paper published in https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10838-015-9296-6#citeas
Keywords: Basic statement, Bipolarity, Norms of representation, Ostensive definition Synthetic a priori
Depositing User: Dr. Harry Smit
Date Deposited: 23 May 2019 11:40
Last Modified: 23 May 2019 11:40
Item ID: 16040
Journal or Publication Title: Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Publisher: Springer
DOI or Unique Handle: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-015-9296-6
Date: 2015
ISSN: 0925-4560
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16040

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item