PhilSci Archive

Can science advance effectively through philosophical criticism and reflection?

Torretti, Roberto (2006) Can science advance effectively through philosophical criticism and reflection? [Preprint]

[img] PDF
Download (1242Kb)

    Abstract

    Prompted by Hasok Chang’s conception of the history and philosophy of science (HPS) as the continuation of science by other means, I examine the possibility of obtaining scientific knowledge through philosophical criticism and reflection, in the light of four historical cases, concerning (i) the role of absolute space in Newtonian dynamics, (ii) the purported contraction of rods and retardation of clocks in Special Relativity, (iii) the reality of the electromagnetic ether, and (iv) the so-called problem of time’s arrow. In all four cases it is clear that a better understanding of such matters can be achieved —and has been achieved— through conceptual analysis. On the other hand, however, it would seem that this kind of advance has more to do with philosophical questions in science than with narrowly scientific questions. Hence, if HPS in effect continues the work of science by other means, it could well be doing it for other ends than those that working scientists ordinarily have in mind.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: Absolute space – Inertial frames – Length contraction – Clock retardation – Special relativity – Ether – Time – Time directedness – Entropy – Boltzmann entropy
    Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
    Specific Sciences > Physics > Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics
    Depositing User: Roberto Torretti
    Date Deposited: 13 Aug 2006
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 14:32
    Item ID: 2875
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2875

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads