PhilSci Archive

Was the Early Calculus an Inconsistent Theory?

Vickers, Peter (2007) Was the Early Calculus an Inconsistent Theory? [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Early_calculus_August07.pdf

Download (197kB)

Abstract

The ubiquitous assertion that the early calculus of Newton and Leibniz was an inconsistent theory is examined. Two different objects of a possible inconsistency claim are distinguished: (i) the calculus as an algorithm; (ii) proposed explanations of the moves made within the algorithm. In the first case the calculus can be interpreted as a theory in something like the logician’s sense, whereas in the second case it acts more like a scientific theory. I find no inconsistency in the first case, and an inconsistency in the second case which can only be imputed to a small minority of the relevant community.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Vickers, Peter
Keywords: calculus, fluxions, infinitesimals, newton, leibniz, inconsistent
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Mathematics
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
Depositing User: Dr Peter Vickers
Date Deposited: 22 Aug 2007
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:15
Item ID: 3477
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3477

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item