Fahmi, Marco
(2008)
MATHEMATICAL MODELS IN SCIENCE: A DEBATE ABOUT ONTOLOGY.
In: UNSPECIFIED.
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
Some philosophers of mathematics argue that the role of mathematical models in science is merely representational: when scientists use mathematical models they only believe that they are adequate representations of the physical phenomenon under investigation. Others disagree with this view and argue that mathematical models also serve as genuine explanations in science. Consequently, the application of mathematical models in science cannot be treated instrumentally and we ought to be realists about mathematics. I advance two reasons to reject realist conclusion: genuine mathematical explanations are indistinguishable from spurious ones. And, for mathematical models to be explanatory, they have to be “bottomlevel”; I deny that we can know which explanations (if any) are bottom level in science. I contend that what plays the explanatory role is the impure function that links physical structures to mathematical structures.
Item Type: 
Conference or Workshop Item
(UNSPECIFIED)

Creators: 
Creators  Email  ORCID 

Fahmi, Marco   

Additional Information: 
Final version submitted for publication 
Keywords: 
Mathematical realism, Indispensability argument, Mathematical models 
Subjects: 
Specific Sciences > Mathematics 
Depositing User: 
Marco Fahmi

Date Deposited: 
28 Feb 2008 
Last Modified: 
07 Oct 2010 15:16 
Item ID: 
3904 
URI: 
http://philsciarchive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3904 
Available Versions of this Item
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)

View Item 