Northcott, Robert (2018) Free will is not a testable hypothesis. [Preprint]
|
Text
Erkenntnis2018.pdf Download (539kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Much recent work in neuroscience aims to shed light on whether we have free will. Can it? Can any science? To answer, we need to disentangle different notions of free will, and clarify what we mean by ‘empirical’ and ‘testable’. That done, my main conclusion is, duly interpreted: that free will is not a testable hypothesis. In particular, it is neither verifiable nor falsifiable by empirical evidence. The arguments for this are not a priori but rather are based on a posteriori consideration of the relevant neuroscientific investigations, as well as on standard philosophy of science work on the notion of testability.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Additional Information: | forthcoming in Erkenntnis | ||||||
| Keywords: | free will, neuroscience, testability | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Confirmation/Induction Specific Sciences > Neuroscience |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Dr Robert Northcott | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 27 Nov 2018 16:46 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 27 Nov 2018 16:46 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 15384 | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Confirmation/Induction Specific Sciences > Neuroscience |
||||||
| Date: | 27 November 2018 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15384 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}