Künstler, Raphaël (2012) Aggregating Judgement in Scientifc Practice. [Preprint]
PDF (Texte presented at the Episteme Conference in 2012)
Aggregating_judgment_in_scientific_practice.pdf - Draft Version Download (170kB) |
Abstract
This paper argues that standard theories of judgment aggregation cannot apply to scientific practice, since science is a temporally extended process that involves both different individuals and different hypotheses during that process. Thus, for example, we seem to have no idea how to determine the judgments of dead scientists about theoretical alternatives that were proposed after their death. The paper then proposes an algorithm for judgment aggregation to try to address some of these challenges.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Judgment Aggregation, Scientifc Practice | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Theory Change |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Raphaël Künstler | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 20 Feb 2016 04:03 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 20 Feb 2016 04:03 | ||||||
Item ID: | 11917 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Theory Change |
||||||
Date: | 2012 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11917 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |