Westphal, Kenneth R.
(2016)
Thought Experiments, Epistemology & our Cognitive (In)Capacities.
In: UNSPECIFIED.
Abstract
Does epistemology collapse for lack of resources other than logic, conceptual analysis and descriptions of one’s own apparent experiences, thoughts and beliefs? No, but understanding how and why not requires, Kant noted, a ‘changed method of thinking’ (veränderte Methode der Denkungsart; KdrV Bxvii, 704). Some of these methodological changes are summarised in §2 in order to identify a philosophical role for thought experiments to help identify logically contingent, though cognitively fundamental capacities and circumstances necessary to human thought, experience and knowledge. As Kant also noted, experiments are only informative in response to posing the right question, indeed: the right kind of question (KdrV Bxii–xiv). Accordingly, preparations for these epistemological thought experiments (§2) fill half of this chapter. The second half (§§3–5), examines three such thought experiments, variously developed by Kant, Hegel, C. I. Lewis, Austin, Wittgenstein and F. L. Will.
Item Type: |
Conference or Workshop Item
(UNSPECIFIED)
|
Creators: |
|
Additional Information: |
To appear in: J.R. Brown, Y. Fehige and M. Stuart, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Thought Experiments (2017), chapter 8. |
Keywords: |
Transcendental proof, global perceptual scepticism, cognitive capacities, synthetic a priori principles, Kant, Hegel, C.I. Lewis, J.L. Austin, Wittgenstein, F.L. Will |
Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism |
Depositing User: |
Prof. Dr. Kenneth R. Westphal
|
Date Deposited: |
24 Aug 2016 15:35 |
Last Modified: |
26 Aug 2016 18:16 |
Item ID: |
12365 |
Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism |
Date: |
2016 |
URI: |
https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12365 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |