Feest, Uljana (2018) Why Replication is Overrated. In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
Text
Feest 2018 Replication manuscript.pdf Download (233kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Current debates about the replication crisis in psychology take it for granted that direct
replication is valuable and focus their attention on questionable research practices in regard to statistical analyses. This paper takes a broader look at the notion of replication as such. It is argued that all experimentation/replication involves individuation
judgments and that research in experimental psychology frequently turns on probing the adequacy of such judgments. In this vein, I highlight the ubiquity of conceptual and material questions in research, and I argue that replication is not as central to
psychological research as it is sometimes taken to be.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | replication, epistemology of experimentation, philosophy of psychology | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Experimentation Specific Sciences > Psychology |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Uljana Feest | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 29 Oct 2018 19:59 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 29 Oct 2018 19:59 | ||||||
Item ID: | 15219 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Experimentation Specific Sciences > Psychology |
||||||
Date: | 29 October 2018 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15219 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |