Arvan, Marcus and Bright, Liam Kofi and Heesen, Remco (2019) Jury Theorems for Peer Review. [Preprint]
There is a more recent version of this item available. |
|
Text
Arvan Bright Heesen Jury Theorems for Peer Review.pdf - Draft Version Download (462kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Peer review is often taken to be the main form of quality control on academic writings. Usually this is carried out by journals. Parts of math and physics appear to have now set up a parallel, crowd-sourced model of peer review, where papers are posted on the arXiv to be publicly discussed. In this paper we argue that crowd-sourced peer review is likely to do better than journal-solicited peer review at sorting papers by quality. Our argument rests on two key claims. First, crowd-sourced peer review will lead to there being on average more reviewers per paper than journal-solicited peer review. Second, due to the wisdom of the crowds, more reviewers will tend to make better judgments than fewer. We make the second claim precise by looking at the Condorcet Jury Theorem as well as two related, novel jury theorems developed specifically to apply to the case of peer review.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||||||||
Keywords: | Philosophy of science Peer review Condorcet Jury Theorem Formal epistemology Social epistemology Bias | ||||||||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics General Issues > Science and Policy General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science |
||||||||||||
Depositing User: | Remco Heesen | ||||||||||||
Date Deposited: | 25 Apr 2019 12:52 | ||||||||||||
Last Modified: | 25 Apr 2019 12:52 | ||||||||||||
Item ID: | 15931 | ||||||||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics General Issues > Science and Policy General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science |
||||||||||||
Date: | 23 April 2019 | ||||||||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15931 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Jury Theorems for Peer Review. (deposited 25 Apr 2019 12:52) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |