Ashton, Zoe (2020) Audience Role in Mathematical Proof Development. [Preprint]
|
Text
V8_NonAnon.pdf Download (509kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The role of audiences in mathematical proof has largely been neglected, in part due to misconceptions like those in Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969) which bar mathematical proofs from bearing reflections of audience consideration. In this paper, I argue that mathematical proof is typically argumentation and that a mathematician develops a proof with his universal audience in mind. In so doing, he creates a proof which reflects the standards of reasonableness embodied in his universal audience. Given this framework, we
can better understand the introduction of proof methods based on the mathematician's likely universal audience. I examine a case study from Alexander and Briggs's work on knot invariants to show that we can fruitfully reconstruct mathematical methods in terms of audiences.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Argumentation, Mathematical Practice, Proof, Deduction, Formal Derivation, Knot Theory, Audience | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Practice Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Proof Specific Sciences > Mathematics |
||||||
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email ashton.95@osu.edu | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 05 Mar 2020 18:01 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 05 Mar 2020 18:01 | ||||||
Item ID: | 16976 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Practice Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Proof Specific Sciences > Mathematics |
||||||
Date: | 2020 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16976 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |