Curiel, Erik (2020) Schematizing the Observer and the Epistemic Content of Theories. [Preprint]

Preview

Text curiel-schema-obsr-epi-content-theors.pdf Download (706kB) | Preview

Abstract

I argue that, contrary to the standard view, one cannot understand the structure and nature of our knowledge in physics without an analysis of the way that observers (and, more generally, measuring instruments and experimental arrangements) are modeled in theory. One upshot is that standard pictures of what a scientific theory can be are grossly inadequate. In particular, standard formulations assume, with no argument ever given, that it is possible to make a clean separation between, on the one hand, one part of the scientific knowledge a physical theory embodies, viz., that encoded in the pure mathematical formalism and, on the other, the remainder of that knowledge. The remainder includes at a minimum what is encoded in the practice of modeling particular systems, of performing experiments, of bringing the results of theory and experiment into mutually fruitful contact---in sum, real application of the theory in actual scientific practice. This assumption comes out most clearly in the picture of semantics that naturally accompanies the standard view of theories: semantics is fixed by ontology's shining City on the Hill, and all epistemology and methodology and other practical issues and considerations are segregated to the ghetto of the theory's pragmatics. We should not assume such a clean separation is possible without an argument, and, indeed, I offer many arguments that such a separation is not feasible. An adequate semantics for theories cannot be founded on ontology, but rather on epistemology and methodology.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Curiel, Erik erik@strangebeautiful.com 0000-0002-5812-3033
Additional Information:	This paper is forthcoming in *Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics*, 2020, with the following changes: what appears in this version as section 5 ("What Measurements and the Observer Are") and section 11 ("Appendix: Précis"), will not appear in the published version due to length constraints; otherwise the two versions are identical (except for trivialities noted in the text).
Keywords:	theory semantics; theory structure; models; epistemology; general relativity; Navier-Stokes Theory
Subjects:	General Issues > Data Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics General Issues > Experimentation General Issues > Models and Idealization Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory Specific Sciences > Physics > Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics General Issues > Structure of Theories General Issues > Theory/Observation
Depositing User:	Dr. Erik Curiel
Date Deposited:	05 Jun 2020 00:41
Last Modified:	05 Jun 2020 00:41
Item ID:	17278
Subjects:	General Issues > Data Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics General Issues > Experimentation General Issues > Models and Idealization Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory Specific Sciences > Physics > Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics General Issues > Structure of Theories General Issues > Theory/Observation
Date:	4 June 2020
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/17278

Available Versions of this Item

• Schematizing the Observer and the Epistemic Content of Theories. (deposited 07 Mar 2019 04:57)
  • Schematizing the Observer and the Epistemic Content of Theories. (deposited 04 Jun 2020 01:40)
    • Schematizing the Observer and the Epistemic Content of Theories. (deposited 05 Jun 2020 00:41) [Currently Displayed]

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item