Gascón, José Ángel (2020) How to argue with coherence. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 35 (3). pp. 327-344. ISSN 2171-679X

Preview

Text def_20435_Gascon_Theoria35-3.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (214kB) | Preview

Abstract

When disagreements arise about the quality of arguments, arguers frequently rely on coherence. Argumentative coherence is mainly manifested in accusations of incoherence and in the production of analogies. With the help of the elements of warrant and of rebuttals in Toulmin's model, it is possible to give a first analysis of this notion.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Published Article or Volume
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Gascón, José Ángel jgascon@ucsc.cl 0000-0001- 5571-660
Additional Information:	ISSN: 0495-4548 (print)
Keywords:	argumentation; analogies; informal logic; rebuttal; warrant
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Logic General Issues > Rhetoric of Science
Depositing User:	Unnamed user with email theoria@ehu.es
Date Deposited:	18 Oct 2020 18:12
Last Modified:	18 Oct 2020 18:12
Item ID:	18281
Journal or Publication Title:	THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
Publisher:	Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Official URL:	https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/THEORIA/article/view...
DOI or Unique Handle:	10.1387/theoria.20435
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Logic General Issues > Rhetoric of Science
Date:	September 2020
Page Range:	pp. 327-344
Volume:	35
Number:	3
ISSN:	2171-679X
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/18281

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item