Au, Yin Chung (2021) Epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research. [Preprint]

	Text EJPA Phil Sci version_Y_Au_2021_epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research.docx Download (313kB)
Preview	Image image1.TIF Download (80kB) | Preview
Preview	Image image3.TIF Download (64kB) | Preview
Preview	Image image2.TIF Download (61kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper proposes an extended version of the interventionist account for causal inference in the practical context of biological mechanism research. This paper studies the details of biological mechanism researchers’ practices of assessing the evidential legitimacy of experimental data, arguing why quantity and variety are two important criteria for this assessment. Because of the nature of biological mechanism research, the epistemic values of these two criteria result from the independence both between the causation of data generation and the causation in question and between different interventions, not techniques. The former independence ensures that the interventions in the causation in question are not affected by the causation that is responsible for data generation. The latter independence ensures the reliability of the final mechanisms not only in the empirical but also the formal aspects. This paper first explores how the researchers use quantity to check the effectiveness of interventions, where they at the same time determine the validity of the difference-making revealed by the results of interventions. Then, this paper draws a distinction between experimental interventions and experimental techniques, so that the reliability of mechanisms, as supported by the variety of evidence, can be safely ensured in the probabilistic sense. The latter process is where the researchers establish evidence of the mechanisms connecting the events of interest. By using case studies, this paper proposes to use ‘intervention’ as the fruitful connecting point of literature between evidence and mechanisms.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Au, Yin Chung z10608041@email.ncku.edu.tw 0000-0001-7175-8933
Additional Information:	The published version can be found in European Journal for Philosophy of Science volume 11, Article number: 59 (2021).
Keywords:	Biological mechanism; Evidence; practice; causal inference; independence
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Biology General Issues > Causation General Issues > Evidence
Depositing User:	Dr Yin Chung Au
Date Deposited:	01 Aug 2021 13:41
Last Modified:	01 Aug 2021 13:41
Item ID:	19395
Official URL:	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13194-0...
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Biology General Issues > Causation General Issues > Evidence
Date:	28 March 2021
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/19395

Available Versions of this Item

• Epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research. (deposited 28 Mar 2021 20:20)
  • Epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research. (deposited 01 Aug 2021 13:41) [Currently Displayed]

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item