Ruyant, Quentin
(2021)
The Debates on Scientific Realism.
Modal Empiricism: Interpreting Science Without Scientific Realism.
pp. 1-12.
Abstract
This is the first chapter of Modal Empiricism: Interpreting Science Without Scientific Realism. The debate on scientific realism results from a tension between the empiricist methodology, which is a defining feature of science, and claims to the effect that science can unveil the fundamental nature of reality. What distinguishes realist and anti-realist positions is not necessarily that the former take scientific knowledge “at face value” or take the side of scientists in general while the latter do not. Rather, realists and anti-realists propose different ways of interpreting science as a whole, and in particular its aim (axiological realism), its possible achievements (epistemic
realism) and its content (semantic realism). The aim of this book is to defend an interpretation that potentially applies to each of these three levels: modal empiricism. This position purports to be the articulation of a pragmatist stance towards science. This introductory chapter briefly presents the position, then outlines the structure of the book.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |