Giovanelli, Marco (2023) Appearance and Reality: Einstein and the Early Debate on the Reality of Length Contraction. [Preprint]
There is a more recent version of this item available. |
|
Text
EinsteinContraction.pdf Download (436kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 1909, Ehrenfest published a note in the Physikalische Zeitschrift showing that a Born rigid cylinder could not be set into rotation without stresses, as elements of the circumference would be contracted but not the radius. Ignatowski and Varicak challenged Ehrenfest's result in the same journal, arguing that the stresses would emerge if length contraction were a real dynamical effect, as in Lorentz's theory. However, no stresses are expected to arise, according to Einstein's theory, where length contraction is only an apparent effect due to an arbitrary choice of clock synchronization. Ehrenfest and Einstein considered this line of reasoning dangerously misleading and took a public stance in the Physikalische Zeitschrift, countering that relativistic length contraction is both apparent and real. It is apparent since it disappears for the comoving observer, but it is also real since it can be experimentally verified. By drawing on his lesser-known private correspondence with Variéak, this paper shows how Einstein used the Ehrenfest paradox as a tool for an 'Einsteinian pedagogy. Einstein's argumentative stance is contrasted with Bell's use of the Dewan-Beran thread-between-spaceships paradox to advocate for a 'Lorentzian pedagogy.' The paper concludes that the disagreement between the two ways of 'teaching special relativity' stems from divergent interpretations of philosophical categories such as 'reality' and 'appearance.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Albert Einstein • Paul Ehrenfest • length contraction • special relativity • Lorentzian pedagogy | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Mathematics General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Marco Giovanelli | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 02 Sep 2023 15:52 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 02 Sep 2023 15:52 | ||||||
Item ID: | 22492 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Mathematics General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
||||||
Date: | 2023 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/22492 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Appearance and Reality: Einstein and the Early Debate on the Reality of Length Contraction. (deposited 02 Sep 2023 15:52) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |