Giovanelli, Marco (2023) Appearance and Reality: Einstein and the Early Debate on the Reality of Length Contraction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 13 (42). ISSN 1879-4912
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
EinsteinContraction.pdf Download (436kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 1909, Ehrenfest published a note in the Physikalische Zeitschrift showing that a Born rigid cylinder could not be set into rotation without stresses, as elements of the circumference would be contracted but not the radius. Ignatowski and Varicak challenged Ehrenfest's result in the same journal, arguing that the stresses would emerge if length contraction were a real dynamical effect, as in Lorentz's theory. However, no stresses are expected to arise, according to Einstein's theory, where length contraction is only an apparent effect due to an arbitrary choice of clock synchronization. Ehrenfest and Einstein considered this line of reasoning dangerously misleading and took a public stance in the Physikalische Zeitschrift, countering that relativistic length contraction is both apparent and real. It is apparent since it disappears for the comoving observer, but it is also real since it can be experimentally verified. By drawing on his lesser-known private correspondence with Variéak, this paper shows how Einstein used the Ehrenfest paradox as a tool for an 'Einsteinian pedagogy. Einstein's argumentative stance is contrasted with Bell's use of the Dewan-Beran thread-between-spaceships paradox to advocate for a 'Lorentzian pedagogy.' The paper concludes that the disagreement between the two ways of 'teaching special relativity' stems from divergent interpretations of philosophical categories such as 'reality' and 'appearance.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Published Article or Volume | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Albert Einstein • Paul Ehrenfest • length contraction • special relativity • Lorentzian pedagogy | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Mathematics General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Marco Giovanelli | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2024 17:32 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 11 Nov 2024 17:32 | ||||||
Item ID: | 22764 | ||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | European Journal for Philosophy of Science | ||||||
Publisher: | Springer | ||||||
Official URL: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13194-0... | ||||||
DOI or Unique Handle: | 10.1007/s13194-023-00555-4 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Mathematics General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
||||||
Date: | 2023 | ||||||
Volume: | 13 | ||||||
Number: | 42 | ||||||
ISSN: | 1879-4912 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/22764 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Appearance and Reality: Einstein and the Early Debate on the Reality of Length Contraction. (deposited 02 Sep 2023 15:52)
- Appearance and Reality: Einstein and the Early Debate on the Reality of Length Contraction. (deposited 11 Nov 2024 17:32) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
View Item |