Dulani, Saakshi (2024) Black Hole Paradoxes: A Unified Framework for Information Loss. [Preprint]

Text
S.Dulani_Dissertation_Post Online.pdf Download (2MB)  Preview 
Abstract
The black hole information loss paradox is a catchall term for a family of puzzles related to black hole evaporation. For almost 50 years, the quest to elucidate the implications of black hole evaporation has not only sustained momentum, but has also become increasingly populated with proposals that seem to generate more questions than they purport to answer. Scholars often neglect to acknowledge ongoing discussions within black hole thermodynamics and statistical mechanics when analyzing the paradox, including the interpretation of BekensteinHawking entropy, which is far from settled. To remedy the dialectical gridlock, I have formulated an overarching, unified framework, which I call “Black Hole Paradoxes”, that integrates the debates and taxonomizes the relevant ‘camps’ or philosophical positions.
I demonstrate that black hole evaporation within Hawking’s semiclassical framework insinuates how latetime Hawking radiation is an entangled global system, a contradiction in terms. The relevant forms of information loss are associated with a decrease in maximal Boltzmann entropy and an increase in global von Neumann entropy respectively, which engender what I’ve branded the “paradox of phantom entanglement”. Prospective solutions are then tasked with demonstrating how latetime Hawking radiation is either exclusively an entangled subsystem, in which a black hole remnant lingers as an information safehouse, or exclusively an unentangled global system, in which information is evacuated to the exterior.
The disagreement between safehouse and evacuation solutions boils down to the statistical interpretation of thermodynamic black hole entropy, i.e., BekensteinHawking entropy. Safehouse solutions attribute BekensteinHawking entropy to a minority of black hole degrees of freedom, those that are associated with the horizon. Evacuation solutions, in contrast, attribute BekensteinHawking entropy to all black hole degrees of freedom. I argue that the interpretation of BekensteinHawking entropy is the litmus test to vet the overpopulated proposal space. So long as any proposal rejecting Hawking’s original calculation independently derives black hole evaporation, globally conserves degrees of freedom and entanglement, preserves a version of semiclassical gravity at subPlanckian scales, and describes black hole thermodynamics in statistical terms, then it counts as a genuine solution to the paradox.
Export/Citation:  EndNote  BibTeX  Dublin Core  ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago)  HTML Citation  OpenURL 
Social Networking: 
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item 