PhilSci Archive

Empowerment as Causal Learning, Causal Learning as Empowerment: A bridge between Bayesian causal hypothesis testing and reinforcement learning.

Gopnik, Alison (2024) Empowerment as Causal Learning, Causal Learning as Empowerment: A bridge between Bayesian causal hypothesis testing and reinforcement learning. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img] Text
Gopnik Empowerment as Causal Learning Final.docx

Download (37kB)

Abstract

Learning about the causal structure of the world is a fundamental problem for human cognition, and causal knowledge is central to both intuitive and scientific theories. Cognitive scientists have applied advances in our formal understanding of causation in philosophy and computer science, particularly within the Causal Bayes Net formalism, to understand human causal learning. In parallel, in the very different tradition of reinforcement learning, researchers have developed the idea of an intrinsic reward signal called “empowerment”. An agent is rewarded for maximizing the mutual information between its actions and their outcomes, regardless of the external reward value of those outcomes. In other words, the agent is rewarded if variation in an action systematically leads to parallel variation in an outcome so that variation in the action predicts variation in the outcome. The result is an agent that has maximal control over its environment. I argue that “empowerment” may be an important bridge between classical Bayesian causal learning and reinforcement learning and may help to characterize causal learning in humans and enable it in machines. More strongly, I make the philosophical argument that causal learning and empowerment gain are very closely related conceptually. If an agent learns an accurate causal model of the world they will necessarily increase their empowerment, and, vice versa, increasing empowerment will lead to a more accurate (if implicit) causal model of the world. This has implications for both accounts of causal learning in cognitive science and AI and for the metaphysics of causation. Empowerment may also explain distinctive empirical features of children’s causal learning, as well as providing a more tractable computational account of how that learning is possible


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Gopnik, Alisongopnik@berkeley.edu0000-0002-7183-0867
Keywords: Causality, Empowerment, Intervention, Cognitive Development, Causal Bayes Nets, Reinforcement Learning
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Psychology > Comparative Psychology and Ethology
Specific Sciences > Computer Science
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Concepts and Representations
Specific Sciences > Psychology > Developmental Psychology
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > Formal Learning Theory
Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning
Depositing User: Prof. Alison Gopnik
Date Deposited: 07 Apr 2024 05:10
Last Modified: 07 Apr 2024 05:10
Item ID: 23268
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Psychology > Comparative Psychology and Ethology
Specific Sciences > Computer Science
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Concepts and Representations
Specific Sciences > Psychology > Developmental Psychology
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > Formal Learning Theory
Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning
Date: 4 April 2024
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/23268

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item