PhilSci Archive

Golden spikes, scientific types, and the ma(r)king of deep time

Witteveen, Joeri (2024) Golden spikes, scientific types, and the ma(r)king of deep time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
Text
2024 GSSTMT Preprint.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Chronostratigraphy is the subfield of geology that studies the relative age of rock strata and that aims at producing a hierarchical classification of (global) divisions of the historical time-rock record. The ‘golden spike’ or ‘GSSP’ approach is the cornerstone of contemporary chronostratigraphic methodology. It is also perplexing. Chronostratigraphers define each global time-rock boundary extremely locally, often by driving a gold-colored pin into an exposed rock section at a particular level. Moreover, they usually avoid rock sections that show any meaningful sign of paleontological disruption or geological discontinuity: the less obvious the boundary, the better. It has been argued that we can make sense of this practice of marking boundaries by comparing the status and function of golden spikes to that of other concrete, particular reference standards from other sciences: holotypes from biological taxonomy and measurement prototypes from the metrology of weight and measures. Alisa Bokulich (2020b) has argued that these ‘scientific types’ are in an important sense one of a kind: they have a common status and function. I will argue that this picture of high-level conceptual unity is mistaken and fails to consider the diversity of aims and purposes of standardization and classification across the sciences. I develop an alternative, disunified account of scientific types that shows how differences in ontological attitudes and epistemic aims inform scientists’ choices between different kinds of scientific types. This perspective on scientific types helps to make sense of an intriguing mid-twentieth-century debate among chronostratigraphers about the very nature of their enterprise. Should chronostratigraphers conventionally make boundaries by designating golden spikes, or should they attempt to mark pre-existing ‘natural’ boundaries with the help of a different kind of scientific type?


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Witteveen, Joerijw@ind.ku.dk0000-0003-1291-9156
Keywords: geology, stratigraphy, metrology, taxonomy, stratotype, GSSP, measurement prototype, kilogram standard, type specimen, holotype, nomenclature, classification, standardization, reference fixing, natural classification
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Systematics
General Issues > Conventionalism
Specific Sciences > Earth Sciences
Specific Sciences > Historical Sciences
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
General Issues > Models and Idealization
General Issues > Natural Kinds
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Dr. Joeri Witteveen
Date Deposited: 21 Apr 2024 00:13
Last Modified: 21 Apr 2024 00:13
Item ID: 23304
Journal or Publication Title: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Publisher: Elsevier
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Systematics
General Issues > Conventionalism
Specific Sciences > Earth Sciences
Specific Sciences > Historical Sciences
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
General Issues > Models and Idealization
General Issues > Natural Kinds
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Date: 2024
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/23304

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item