Justin, Martin and Šešelja, Dunja and Straßer, Christian and Trpin, Borut (2025) The Mix Matters: Exploring the Interplay Between Epistemic and Zetetic Norms in Scientific Disagreement. [Preprint]

Text the_mix_matters_preprint.pdf Download (2MB)

Abstract

What is the rational response to a scientific disagreement? Many epistemologists argue that disagreement with an epistemic peer should generally lead to conciliation by lowering confidence in the disputed belief or even suspending judgment altogether. Although this conciliatory approach is widely regarded as a norm of individual rationality, its value in the context of collective scientific inquiry is less clear. Some have even raised concerns that conciliating in scientific disagreements may slow progress or reduce the efficiency of inquiry. In this paper, we introduce a novel agent-based model that captures key aspects of scientific disagreement by incorporating both epistemic norms, which govern belief revision, and zetetic norms, which guide how scientists pursue inquiry. Our results indicate that the effects of conciliating in the face of disagreement---whether detrimental or beneficial---depend on the zetetic norms that scientists follow. When they focus on exploiting the hypothesis that they believe is most likely to succeed, remaining steadfast is more effective. However, with exploratory scientists, conciliation does not negatively affect group performance. These findings highlight the critical role of zetetic norms in determining the rational response to disagreement in scientific practice.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Justin, Martin martin.justin1@um.si 0000-0002-2614-9423 Šešelja, Dunja dunja.seselja@rub.de 0000-0001-5679-5787 Straßer, Christian christian.strasser@rub.de 0000-0002-4117-7019 Trpin, Borut borut.trpin1@um.si 0000-0002-1121-9388
Keywords:	scientific disagreement, scientific inquiry, agent-based modeling, zetetic norms, bandit models, peer disagreement
Subjects:	General Issues > Computer Simulation General Issues > Evidence General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Depositing User:	Dr. Borut Trpin
Date Deposited:	15 May 2025 12:19
Last Modified:	15 May 2025 12:19
Item ID:	25315
Subjects:	General Issues > Computer Simulation General Issues > Evidence General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Date:	2025
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/25315

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item