Ratti, Emanuele and Termine, Alberto and Facchini, Alessandro (2025) Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ML and theory-ladenness preprint August 2025.pdf Download (551kB) |
Abstract
We provide an analysis of theory-ladenness in machine learning (ML) in science, where ‘theory’ (that we call 'domain-theory') refers to the domain knowledge of the scientific discipline where ML is used. By constructing an account of ML models based on a comparison with phenomenological models, we show (against recent trends in philosophy of science) that ML model-building is mostly indifferent to domain-theory. This claim, we argue, has far-reaching consequences for the transferability of ML across scientific disciplines, and shifts the priorities of the debate on theory-ladenness in ML from descriptive to normative.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. (deposited 05 Sep 2024 12:51)
- Machine Learning and Theory-Ladenness: A Phenomenological Account. (deposited 22 Aug 2025 14:36) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}