Heesen, Remco (2025) Expediting the Flow of Knowledge Versus Rushing into Print. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
![]() |
Text
Heesen 2025 Expediting the Flow of Knowledge Versus Rushing into Print.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Recent empirical work has shown that many scientific results may not be reproducible. By itself, this does not entail that there is a problem (or a "reproducibility crisis"). However, I argue that there is a problem: the reward structure of science incentivizes scientists to focus on speed and impact at the expense of the reproducibility of their work. I illustrate this using a well-known failure of reproducibility: Fleischmann and Pons' work on cold fusion. I then use a rational choice model to identify a set of sufficient conditions for this problem to arise, and I argue that these conditions plausibly apply to a wide range of research situations. In the conclusion I consider possible solutions and implications for how Fleischmann and Pons' work should be evaluated.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Additional Information: | For proofs of the theorems mentioned in my book, please refer to appendices A and B. For proofs of the theorems mentioned in "Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable", please refer to appendix A. | ||||||
Keywords: | Philosophy of science; Reproducibility; Social epistemology; Formal epistemology; Pressure to publish; Cold fusion | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Science and Policy General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science |
||||||
Depositing User: | Remco Heesen | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2025 10:42 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2025 10:42 | ||||||
Item ID: | 26620 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Science and Policy General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science |
||||||
Date: | 11 September 2025 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/26620 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Expediting the Flow of Knowledge Versus Rushing into Print. (deposited 16 Oct 2018 18:32)
- Expediting the Flow of Knowledge Versus Rushing into Print. (deposited 12 Sep 2025 10:42) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |