Elber-Dorozko, Lotem (2026) What can be inferred from a ring in the fly brain? A case for historical functions in neuroscience. In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
Text
PSA_2026_ring_model_philsciRxiv.pdf Download (309kB) |
Abstract
It is generally accepted that neural properties play an important role in supporting cognitive models. But it is less clear how this is done. Several authors suggested that neural evidence supports cognitive models through inference to the best explanation. This paper argues that for such inference to work, scientists should adopt a historical approach to functions because neural properties can only be explained by their causal history. The method by which such inferences can take place is exemplified on a case study of the ring-attractor model for head-direction representation, and the neural evidence for it in flies and in mice.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | biological function; neuroscientific evidence; ring model; etiological functions | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology Specific Sciences > Neuroscience > Cognitive Neuroscience General Issues > Evidence Specific Sciences > Neuroscience |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Lotem Elber-Dorozko | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 08 Jun 2026 18:27 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 08 Jun 2026 18:27 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 29848 | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology Specific Sciences > Neuroscience > Cognitive Neuroscience General Issues > Evidence Specific Sciences > Neuroscience |
||||||
| Date: | 31 May 2026 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29848 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



