Lean, Christopher
(2026)
Philosophical Approaches to the Biodiversity Concept.
[Preprint]
Abstract
The concept of biodiversity must function simultaneously as a scientific metric for biotic difference, a normative goal, and a political instrument. These differing aims have their origins in the very formation of the concept and pull any clarification of it in different, sometimes incompatible, directions. Scientific precision requires narrowing the concept in ways that reduce its ethical reach and political flexibility, while political usability requires a vagueness that undermines scientific rigour and ethical salience. This central tension in the concept explains the division of the philosophical literature into realist, eliminativist, and deflationary camps, each prioritising one of these aims. Realists anchor biodiversity to causally significant features of the natural world; eliminativists argue that the concept distorts or displaces the full range of nature's value; deflationists derive biodiversity from the political procedures by which conservation is practised. This review surveys the philosophy of biodiversity literature through this tripartite lens and uses it to identify emerging challenges to the concept.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}