Titelbaum, Michael (2007) Unlearning What You Have Learned. In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
PDF
TitelbaumUnlearning.pdf Download (214kB) |
Abstract
Bayesian modeling techniques have proven remarkably successful at representing rational constraints on agents’ degrees of belief. Yet Frank Arntzenius’s “Shangri-La” example shows that these techniques fail for stories involving forgetting. This paper presents a formalized, expanded Bayesian modeling framework that generates intuitive verdicts about agents’ degrees of belief after losing information. The framework’s key result, called Generalized Conditionalization, yields applications like a version of Bas van Fraassen’s Reflection Principle for forgetting. These applications lead to questions about why agents should coordinate their doxastic states over time, and about the commitments an agent can make by assigning degrees of belief.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Bayesianism, forgetting | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Confirmation/Induction |
||||||
Depositing User: | Michael Titelbaum | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 03 Jan 2007 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:14 | ||||||
Item ID: | 3120 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Confirmation/Induction |
||||||
Date: | 2007 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3120 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |