Healey, Richard (2007) Gauge Theory and the Theta Vacuum. In: UNSPECIFIED.
This is the latest version of this item.

PDF
Madrid_paper_(for_publication).pdf Download (132kB) 
Abstract
According to conventional wisdom, local gauge symmetry is not a symmetry of nature, but an artifact of how our theories represent nature. But a study of the socalled thetavacuum appears to refute this view. The ground state of a quantized nonAbelian YangMills gauge theory is characterized by a realvalued, dimensionless parameter theta—a fundamental new constant of nature. The structure of this vacuum state is often said to arise from a degeneracy of the vacuum of the corresponding classical theory, which degeneracy allegedly arises from the fact that “large” (but not “small”) local gauge transformations connect physically distinct states of zero field energy. If that is right, then some local gauge transformations do generate empirical symmetries. In defending conventional wisdom against this challenge I hope to clarify the meaning of empirical symmetry while deepening our understanding of gauge transformations. I distinguish empirical from theoretical symmetries. Using Galileo’s ship and Faraday’s cube as illustrations, I say when an empirical symmetry is implied by a theoretical symmetry. I explain how the thetavacuum arises, and how “large” gauge transformations differ from “small” ones. I then present two analogies from elementary quantum mechanics. By applying my analysis of the relation between empirical and theoretical symmetries, I show which analogy faithfully portrays the character of the vacuum state of a classical nonAbelian YangMills gauge theory. The upshot is that “large” as well as “small” gauge transformations are purely formal symmetries of nonAbelian YangMills gauge theories, whether classical or quantized. It is still worth distinguishing between these kinds of symmetries. An analysis of gauge within the constrainedHamiltonian formalism yields the result that “large” gauge transformations should not be classified as gauge transformations; indeed, nor should “global” gauge transformations. In a theory in which boundary conditions are modeled dynamically, “global” gauge transformations may be associated with physical symmetries, corresponding to translations of these extra dynamical variables. Such translations are symmetries if and only if charge is conserved. But it is hard to argue that these symmetries are empirical, and in any case they do not correspond to any constant phase change in a quantum state.
Export/Citation:  EndNote  BibTeX  Dublin Core  ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago)  HTML Citation  OpenURL 
Social Networking: 
Item Type:  Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)  

Creators: 


Additional Information:  To appear in the EPSA conference proceedings.  
Keywords:  gauge, symmetry, theta vacuum, YangMills  
Subjects:  Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances Specific Sciences > Physics > Fields and Particles Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory 

Depositing User:  Richard Andrew Healey  
Date Deposited:  15 Jan 2009  
Last Modified:  07 Oct 2010 15:17  
Item ID:  4403  
Subjects:  Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances Specific Sciences > Physics > Fields and Particles Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory 

Date:  2007  
URI:  https://philsciarchive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4403 
Available Versions of this Item

Gauge Symmetry and the Theta Vacuum. (deposited 09 Jul 2007)
 Gauge Theory and the Theta Vacuum. (deposited 15 Jan 2009) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item 