Sytsma, Justin and Livengood, Jonathan (2010) A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
A_New_Perspective_Concerning_Experiments_on_Semantic_Intuitions.pdf Download (202kB) |
Abstract
In two fascinating articles, Machery, Mallon, Nichols, and Stich [2004, forthcoming] use experimental methods to raise a specter of doubt about reliance on intuitions in developing theories of reference which are then deployed in philosophical arguments outside the philosophy of language. Machery et al. ran a cross-cultural survey asking Western and East Asian participants about a famous case from the philosophical literature on reference (Kripke’s Gödel example). They interpret their results as indicating that there is significant variation in participants’ intuitions about semantic reference for that case. We argue that this interpretation is mistaken. We detail a type of ambiguity found in Machery et al.’s probe but not yet noted in the response literature. We argue that this epistemic ambiguity could have affected their results. We do not stop there, however: Rather than rest content with a possibility claim, we ran four studies to test the impact of this ambiguity on participants’ responses. We found that this accounts for much of the variation in Machery et al.’s original experiment. We conclude that in the light of our new data, their argument is no longer convincing.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
|||||||||
Additional Information: | Author Posting. (c) Australasian Association of Philosophy, 2010. This is the author's (preprint) version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Australasian Association of Philosophy for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, January 2010: doi:10.1080/00048401003639832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048401003639832 | |||||||||
Keywords: | Reference; Semantic Intuitions; Experimental Philosophy; Machery, Mallon, Nichols, and Stich; Kripke; Gödel | |||||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Thought Experiments Specific Sciences > Psychology Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Experimentation |
|||||||||
Depositing User: | Justin Sytsma | |||||||||
Date Deposited: | 22 Jan 2010 | |||||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:19 | |||||||||
Item ID: | 5130 | |||||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Thought Experiments Specific Sciences > Psychology Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Experimentation |
|||||||||
Date: | January 2010 | |||||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5130 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions. (deposited 02 Nov 2009)
- A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions. (deposited 22 Jan 2010) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |