Ahmed, Arif (2010) Smokers and psychos: Egan cases don't work. [Preprint]
|
Microsoft Word
Smokers_and_psychos.docx Download (152kB) |
Abstract
Andy Egan's Smoking Lesion and Psycho Button cases are supposed to be counterexamples to Causal Decision Theory (CDT). I argue that if well-known Newcomb type cases don't already refute CDT then neither do Egan's cases. In any event Egan's cases add nothing new to whatever case already exists against CDT.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Causal Decision Theory | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Causation General Issues > Decision Theory |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Arif Ahmed | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 18 Oct 2010 11:18 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 18 Oct 2010 11:18 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 8341 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Causation General Issues > Decision Theory |
||||||
| Date: | 17 October 2010 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8341 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



