Werndl, Charlotte (2011) Observational Equivalence of Deterministic and Indeterministic Descriptions and the Role of Different Observations. In: UNSPECIFIED.
This is the latest version of this item.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF
EPSAProceedings_CharlotteWerndl.pdf - Submitted Version Download (116kB) |
Abstract
Recently some results have been presented which show that certain kinds of deterministic descriptions and indeterministic descriptions are observationally equivalent (Werndl 2009a, 2010). This paper focuses on some philosophical questions prompted by these results. More specifically, first, I will discuss the philosophical comments made by mathematicians about observational equivalence, in particular Ornstein and Weiss (1991). Their comments are vague, and I will argue that, according to a reasonable interpretation, they are misguided. Second, the results on observational equivalence raise the question of whether the deterministic or indeterministic description is preferable relative to all evidence. If none of them is preferable, there is underdetermination. I will criticize Winnie's (1998) argument that, by appealing to different observations, one finds that the deterministic description is preferable. In particular, I will clarify a confusion in this argument. Furthermore, I will argue that if the concern is a strong kind of underdetermination, the argument delivers the desired conclusion but this conclusion is trivial; and for other kinds of underdetermination of interest the argument fails.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Determinism, Indeterminism, Observational Equivalence, Underdetermination, Different Observations, Ergodic Theory | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics Specific Sciences > Physics > Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Charlotte Werndl | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 02 Jun 2011 11:00 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 02 Jun 2011 11:00 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 8644 | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics Specific Sciences > Physics > Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics |
||||||
| Date: | 2011 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8644 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Observational Equivalence of Deterministic and Indeterministic Descriptions and the Role of Different Observations. (deposited 26 Mar 2010)
- Observational Equivalence of Deterministic and Indeterministic Descriptions and the Role of Different Observations. (deposited 02 Jun 2011 11:00) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}