Pence, Charles H. (2011) “Describing our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophy of W.F.R. Weldon. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
Microsoft Word
pence-weldon-preprint-2.doc - Accepted Version Download (123kB) |
Abstract
There are two motivations commonly ascribed to historical actors for taking up statistics: to reduce complicated data to a mean value (e.g., Quetelet), and to take account of diversity (e.g., Galton). Different motivations will, it is assumed, lead to different methodological decisions in the practice of the statistical sciences. Karl Pearson and W.F.R. Weldon are generally seen as following directly in Galton’s footsteps. I argue for two related theses in light of this standard interpretation, based on a reading of several sources in which Weldon, independently of Pearson, reflects on his own motivations. First, while Pearson does approach statistics from this “Galtonian” perspective, he is, consistent with his positivist philosophy of science, utilizing statistics to simplify the highly variable data of biology. Weldon, on the other hand, is brought to statistics by a rich empiricism and a desire to preserve the diversity of biological data. Secondly, we have here a counterexample to the claim that divergence in motivation will lead to a corresponding separation in methodology. Pearson and Weldon, despite embracing biometry for different reasons, settled on precisely the same set of statistical tools for the investigation of evolution.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | biometry; Mendelism; Pearson, Karl; positivism; statistics; Weldon, W. F. R. | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Causation General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
Depositing User: | Charles H. Pence | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 22 Jul 2011 14:48 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2011 14:48 | ||||||
Item ID: | 8731 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Causation General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
Date: | 22 July 2011 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8731 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
“Describing our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophy of W.F.R. Weldon. (deposited 03 Nov 2010 01:46)
- ‘‘Describing our whole experience’’: The statistical philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson. (deposited 26 Oct 2011 11:39)
- “Describing our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophy of W.F.R. Weldon. (deposited 22 Jul 2011 14:48) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |