Hicks, Daniel (2014) A New Direction for Science and Values. [Preprint]
There is a more recent version of this item available. |
|
PDF
Hicks—new_direction.pdf - Accepted Version Download (260kB) |
Abstract
The controversy over the old ideal of ``value-free science'' has cooled significantly over the past decade. Many philosophers of science now agree that even ethical and political values may play a substantial role in all aspects of scientific inquiry. Consequently, in the last few years, work in science and values has become more specific: Which values may influence science, and in which ways? Or, how do we distinguish illegitimate from illegitimate kinds of influence? In this paper, I argue that this problem requires philosophers of science to take a new direction. I present two case studies in the influence of values on scientific inquiry: feminist values in archaeology and commercial values in pharmaceutical research. I offer a preliminary assessment of these cases, that the influence of values was legitimate in the feminist case, but not in the pharmaceutical case. I then turn to three major approaches to distinguish legitimate from illegitimate influences of values, including the distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic values and Heather Douglas' distinction between direct and indirect roles for values. I argue that none of these three approaches gives an adequate analysis of the two cases. In the concluding section, I briefly sketch my own approach, which draws more heavily on ethics than the others, and is more promising as a solution to the current problem. This is the new direction in which I think science and values should move.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Additional Information: | Forthcoming in Synthese | ||||||
Keywords: | science and values; feminism; pharmaceuticals; commercial science; relativism; epistemic values; direct and indirect roles for values | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Anthropology General Issues > Ethical Issues General Issues > Feminist Approaches Specific Sciences > Medicine General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dan Hicks | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 13 Mar 2014 17:49 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 21 Sep 2014 13:41 | ||||||
Item ID: | 10559 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Anthropology General Issues > Ethical Issues General Issues > Feminist Approaches Specific Sciences > Medicine General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Date: | 2014 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10559 |
Available Versions of this Item
- A New Direction for Science and Values. (deposited 13 Mar 2014 17:49) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |