Norton, Joshua
(2014)
Weak Discernibility and Relations Between Quanta.
In: UNSPECIFIED.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45272/45272cfc6401137773be43c46c58e001c0b1facb" alt="" Preview |
|
PDF
PIIDY_(Writing_Sample_and_Pre-Print).pdf
- Accepted Version
Download (194kB)
|
Abstract
Some authors (Muller and Saunders 2008, Huggett and Norton, 2013) have attempted to defend Leibniz's identity of indicernibes through weak discernibility. The idea is that if there is a symmetric, non-reflexive physical relation which holds between two particles, then those particles cannot be identical. In this paper I focus only on Muller and Saunders' account and argue that the means by which they achieve weak discernibility is not through a physical observable but an alternate mathematical construction which is both unorthodox and incomplete. Muller and Saunders build a map from numbers to a set of observables (mostly) and out of this map construct a weakly discerning formal relation. What Muller and Saunders' do not provide is a worked out account of how such maps pick out physical relations between particles.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b957c/b957c32ba904d071ac409de91a699d082ce03394" alt="View Item View Item" |
View Item |