Kincaid, Harold (2014) Open Empirical and Methodological Issues in the Individualism-Holism Debate. In: UNSPECIFIED.
Microsoft Word
kincaid_psa_2014.doc Download (100kB) |
Abstract
I briefly argue that some issues in the individualism-holism debate have been fairly clearly settled and other issues still plagued by unclarity. The main argument of the paper is that there are a set of clear empirical issues around the holism-individualism debate that are central problems in current social science research. Those include questions about when we can be holist and how individualist we can be in social explanation.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | methodological individualism holism reduction mechanisms | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Economics General Issues > Reductionism/Holism |
||||||
Depositing User: | harold kincaid | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 10 Nov 2014 16:17 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 10 Nov 2014 16:17 | ||||||
Item ID: | 11135 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Economics General Issues > Reductionism/Holism |
||||||
Date: | 8 November 2014 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11135 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |