Saatsi, Juha (2015) Historical inductions, Old and New. [Preprint]
![]() |
PDF
Historical_inductions_final.pdf Download (313kB) |
Abstract
I review prominent historical arguments against scientific realism to indicate how they display a systematic overshooting in the conclusions drawn from the historical evidence. The root of the overshooting can be located in some critical, undue presuppositions regarding realism. I will highlight these presuppositions in connection with both Laudan's 'Old induction' and Stanford's New Induction, and then delineate a minimal realist view that does without the problematic presuppositions.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Additional Information: | Forthcoming in Synthese | ||||||
Keywords: | Scientific Realism; Laudan; Pessimistic Induction; Stanford | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism | ||||||
Depositing User: | Juha Saatsi | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 28 Oct 2015 13:16 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 28 Oct 2015 13:16 | ||||||
Item ID: | 11742 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism | ||||||
Date: | 2015 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11742 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |