Sprenger, Jan (2015) The Probabilistic No Miracles Argument. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
Realism_v6(unblinded).pdf Download (327kB) |
Abstract
This paper develops a probabilistic reconstruction of the No Miracles Argument (NMA) in the debate between scientific realists and anti-realists. The goal of the paper is to clarify and to sharpen the NMA by means of a probabilistic formalization. In particular, we demonstrate that the persuasive force of the NMA depends on the particular disciplinary context where it is applied, and the stability of theories in that discipline. Assessments and critiques of "the" NMA, without reference to a particular context, are misleading and should be relinquished. This result has repercussions for recent anti-realist arguments, such as the claim that the NMA commits the base rate fallacy (Howson 2000, Magnus and Callender2004). It also helps to explain the persistent disagreement between realists and anti-realists.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | scientific realism Bayesian epistemology No Miracles Argument | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism |
||||||
Depositing User: | Jan Sprenger | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 25 Jan 2016 18:21 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 25 Jan 2016 18:21 | ||||||
Item ID: | 11884 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism |
||||||
Date: | March 2015 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11884 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The Probabilistic No Miracles Argument. (deposited 28 Mar 2015 17:21)
- The Probabilistic No Miracles Argument. (deposited 25 Jan 2016 18:21) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |