Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2018) Replies. [Preprint]
|
Text
SYNT-D-17-01020_R1 (1).pdf Download (875kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book ystematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford UP, 2013).
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Systematicity theory; demarcation criterion; scientific rationality; continuity thesis; science education; clinical medicine; Socratic scientific realism | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science | ||||||
| Depositing User: | Dr. Paul Hoyningen-Huene | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 20 Feb 2018 20:30 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 20 Feb 2018 20:30 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 14398 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science | ||||||
| Date: | 17 February 2018 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/14398 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}