PhilSci Archive

Whose Devil? Which Details?

Belot, Gordon (2003) Whose Devil? Which Details? [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
devil.pdf
Download (2MB)

Abstract

Batterman has recently argued that fundamental theories are typically explanatorily inadequate, in that there exist physical phenomena whose explanation requires that the conceptual apparatus of a fundamental theory be supplemented by that of a less fundamental theory. This paper is an extended critical commentary on that argument: situating its importance, describing its structure, and developing a line of objection to it. The objection is that in the examples Batterman considers, the mathematics of the less fundamental theory is definable in terms of the mathematics of the fundamental theory and that only the latter need be given a physical interpretation---so we can view the desired explanation as drawing only upon resources internal to the more fundamental physical theory. (The paper also includes an appendix surveying some recent results on quantum chaos.)

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |
Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Belot, Gordon
Keywords: Batterman; Semi-classical analysis; quantum chaos
Subjects: General Issues > Reductionism/Holism
Specific Sciences > Complex Systems
Specific Sciences > Physics
Depositing User: Gordon Belot
Date Deposited: 14 Dec 2003
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:12
Item ID: 1515
Subjects: General Issues > Reductionism/Holism
Specific Sciences > Complex Systems
Specific Sciences > Physics
Date: December 2003
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1515

Commentary/Response Threads

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item